I don't especially feel I have time to be cozy and warm. I have to get to the point, and make the point, and take no prisoners.
JimmyZ, this is where you are wrong. You take prisoners every day. You bludgeon them with your opinions mascaraded as facts. You won't admit that they are merely opinions. You contradict yourself in myriads of ways (your "subtle, but huge" comment to Anthony gave me peals of laughter) Yet it is your way or the highway. I'll take the highway, thanks. Mary is right--a one-sided argument is worse than divorce, especially when that one-sided argument gets dirty in the process.
I don't mind confrontation, but what you do is absolutely assinine. Do you really influence many with your attitude? Those who don't already agree with you? Anthony agrees with you most of the time, but you even cut him down. This isn't about making your point. For you it is all about winning, it is all about stirring up controversy for your radio show. Shucks, I was out all day, but here you are making the same stale arguments with someone else who dared to step in and comment.
I'm thinking of starting a private group here and call it "The JimmyZ Recovery Group." Private, invitation only, for those who have been damaged by the debatable skills of JimmyZ.
Oh boy. Did you see why he even began an argument with me? That was HIS argument, dear, not mine. He didn't like my attitude (God only knows why), and decided to attack my flowchart. ROTFL
Yeah, I saw him win several points against you, but you kept backtracking, trying to weasel your way out. Your flow chart is not a flow chart--it is nothing close to a flow chart. It is a characiature of a flow chart, kind of like an SNL version. Just another cartoon in your package of opinions.
So no, I only responded to Anthony, and I didn't do nearly as much cutting as he did in that dialogue. You see what you want to see.
No, you didn't merely respond to Anthony. I've never seen anyone else do as good a job at pointing out the fallacies of your reasoning as he did. Of course, it didn't help YOU any. You seem to be impervious to correction.
If Jonathan allows that kind of a group - created for the purpose of excluding me from it, please do. I'll have a mole inside in no time. But more importantly - It would be testament to me. I kind of like the idea.
What a sad, sad commentary, that you would think it a good thing for others get together behind your back to commiserate and recover from the venom that drips from your lips.
No such thing as bad publicity....
I don't know, it isn't working so well for Herman Cain right now.
Jimmy Z said:
Most constitutionalists are NOT birthers - in fact FEW are. Most Constitutionalists are not focused on the birther issue at all.
I would bet it all in Vegas that there will be no stymie of Obama. After all, nothing so far has stymied him and his team. You can bet they won't address this at all.
The BFDs, Birthers Focused on Disappointment, get rallied up at how many tactic now? I don't even pay attention to all of it but I've seen birfers get excited about a dozen different courtroom antics and it always fails. This will be no different. Obsession leads to irrational expectations.
And once again, even if it did produce something, IMPEACHMENT IS IMPOSSIBLE. So we end up back at Election Day 2012.
Talk about one track and myopic. *L*
i love this drawing, but really, the word birther is still being mentioned in relation to the 2012 election cyble... really?!!! lol lol lol i love you all.
he never did answer what he didn't like about the flowchart,
Actually Jimmy, I did answer you several times.
Apparently either you cannot or will not read what was said. Let me try again.
First, by convention, it is not a flow chart.It is a diagram, a graphic, a piece that you are proud of. But it is not a flowchart.
Secondly, it assumes only outcomes of which you approve. For example, if the birthers are right you say "no" to "impeach?" Most likely that is a fallacy as the RNC who DOES have standing to press the issue will.
Your chart assume the election is the only outcome as if people can't be doing multiple things, and taking multiple paths at the same time.
In other words, your little diagram is flawed in its presentation, flawed in its conclusions and narrow (therefore flawed) in scope.
That is what is wrong with it and that is why your continued total reliance on it is misplaced at best.
These reasons have not worked, because the house will not impeach him.
No, these reasons have not worked because there is no substance to them at the current time.
It has shown its continual refusal to do so.
Okay..... I'll play along. What specific charge do you want brought forth under Article 2, Section 4 of the Constitution for impeachment?