Scott Beeman said:
I lose absolutely nothing when that pathetic scumbag paul loses. America does not need idiot muslim butt kissers like paul. We have enough like you already.
^^^^^^ Ignorance at its very core ^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's funny when the Saudi's actually funded 9-11, they weren't put on the state funded sponsors of terrorism, and W was lead by the little pinky finger by an autocratic king when touring Saudi Arabia... This whole "war on terror" is purely political and you are a sheep that believes whatever the government tells you... some conservative you are.
give one example of Paul's "muslim butt kissing'. Paul is the polar opposite of Obama and Bush. You have to understand that INTERVENTIONISM elicits hatred that CAUSES TERROR.
Non-intervention and an end to foreign aid to RICH countries makes us safer in the long run. Read this article by ex-reagan officials.
The majority of ex-generals and CIA officials AGREE with Ron Paul on foreign policy. It's called
"blow-back". WikiPedia the term. get educated.
Jonathan Cousar said:
That's EXACTLY right Robert! What has Ron Paul ever done that actually made a difference? Other than blab about how bad everybody ELSE is? And why has he been there for nearly 40 years??? Whatever happened to the FOUNDING FATHER'S idea of limited citizen-service??? So much for the founding ideas.
Lol he's the only statesman in congress. Never voted for an unbalanced budget, a congressional pay raise, or against the constitution in it's founding form. in a free society, people have the right to choose who they want to represent them, if everyone was like the founders Ron wouldn't have even left his OBGYN practice.
What ever happened to living within our means? what ever happened to ending entangling alliances? what ever happened to letting europe (and the world in general) to their own trivial conflicts? what ever happened letting people choose what to consume when it comes to their bodies? what ever happened keeping the fruits of our labor? what ever happened actually obeying the constitution REGARDLESS of false sense of national security?
to deny that paul is the only one that speaks by the standards of the constitution is pure retardation. the structures of congress, by both parties, are limited to written and [largely unwritten] rules that congress has emplaced to benefit those already in power with influence. if you don't follow the pack of power seeking officials, you don't get special treatment.
the more you argue against Paul the more you make evident you know nothing about the founders nor the constitution. it's my opinion that this website is more mainstream Republican than founding principle conservatism.