Forums » Science

• Dirty Hippie

  

  • 1068 posts
   

  December 11, 2009 10:42:45 AM EST

  We know quite a lot, its just not in the Bible. Sorry, did i say we? Continents leave tracks, which we can trace back approximately and see what the Earth used to look like.
  
  "Please see this website to learn more. Only the naive do not think we are not polluting, sure we are and I am all for stopping that which is toxic and makes sense to do, CO2 in the quantities we effect is a non factor. CO2 is a distraction from real pollution and a tool to control us."-Mateniya
  
  You say you want to stop pollution, but are you actively working not to pollute? I doubt it. What would you be willing to give up?
• Michael Daugherty

  

  • 260 posts
   

  January 1, 2010 11:54:21 AM EST

  Can we agree that the "scientific" term is global climatic change? and NOT global warming...see, Global Warming, is scientifically inconsistent, as SOMETIMES (like in 1976, when I was freshman in High School) the temperate trend is "cooling". BTW, Global Warming and Evolution are both GREAT examples of pseudo/scientific political religion. You can tell whenever the "scientist" says, "The debate is OVER" (See: Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed)
• Roger Gay

  

  • 18 posts
   

  November 21, 2010 3:10:29 AM EST

  No, Micheal. We can't agree that PR spin in support of a political agenda defines proper scientific terminology. Besides, you're one step behind. Global warming got laughed out of the water and then global climate change got laughed out of the water. Now they're trying out "global climate disruption." That of course, is being laughed out of the water too, but we're all just a little tired of laughing at this corrupt nonsense.