Search:
Advanced Search



Connect
Posted: August 31, 2009 - 1 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]

This is purely for entertainment purposes.  

It is a sad day when long-time ties are broken for whatever reason, but in this case it is obviously for the better. As the saying goes, "When God closes a door, he opens a window" and I realize that this change is part of my spiritual evolution.


Throughout this post I will place my "Editor's notes" in [brackets] Enjoy!
==========================
==================

I regret that I don't have her original Declaration of "FAITH", "TRUST", and "love, love, LOVE" since when I booted her as a friend it deleted all her posts. Although I was distressed at first, looking back now it is quite entertaining and testifies to the typical reaction of an Obamaite (or more often just a liberal) when you try to use reason or logic: coming UNHINGED...

ME: We need to have this conversation "off the air" because it's a very passionate subject. I want you to help me understand. I am somewhat surprised that we are so diametrically opposed on this issue, so I want to delve into the logic and reason you are working with so I can better understand your conclusions. Are you game?

HER: I don't see so passion so much but hysteria expressed in these insane town hall freakouts. Any form of thought or any system that has become callus, calicified and so rigid will begin to crack. I am not surprised to witness those who identify and adhere to such rigid forms of thought suffering much the same condition. Since I was a kid, studying Buddhism, I have always strived for the middle way. Perhaps I had not shown it to others, but this is my heart. I shun extremes. 
[ED note: Still has not answered my question]

ME: I haven't seen hysteria in these town halls. What I see are people who are angry that their choices are being taken away and their representatives are either A) ignoring them or B) telling them more lies. I was amazed to see the townspeople interrupt their representatives with the words "NO" That's not true!" and "That's a lie" and NOT sit back down and shut up. They're not taking it anymore. And so now the chicken-hearted politicians are holding town halls "by telephone" or by "television" where they don't have to be confronted by the pesky voters. It's OUR government and the Congress and Senate work for us - they do not RULE us. The problems seem to be arising when the SEIU and the ACORN minions make their way onto the scene...did you not see the footage of them beating up the man in St Louis? Thuggery. That is not supposed to happen in America and it will not be tolerated. That is the kind of action that happens in countries under dictatorships. What I fail to understand is that with so many other countries offering socialistic, communistic, and dictatorial societies why this violent sector of society just doesn't take the easy route and move out rather than destroy this unique country that stands for freedom and individual sovereignty. Puzzling...

HER: I agree that , our so-called representatives have ignored us for too long but we have been speaking up for years. In fact it bothered the last admin so much that they shut people up saying, “:If you are not for us you are against us.” Then listened in on telephone conversations as if they were KGB. So when Obama invites the common fol k to actually converse on the subject, instead of speaking intellegibly the angry mobs bring --- guns? Poor Obama! And I am embarrassed for these yahoos if they themselves are not appropriately embarrassed for themselves. 
As for lies? WMDs, 
[ED note: another typical maneuver: change the subject/blame Bush. In retrospect, I see I should have ignored this and stuck my original question]
and stategically flashed color coded fear codes were used to herd folks into voting for the liars who whipped up such devices. SO many of us did not buy it for one second. Don't be embarrassed if you did tho. [ED note: assumes that because I disagree with Obama I MUST have been a rabid Bush supporter] Half of America believed the BS. 
Just beware that you do not becvome one of those who reach for guns before reasoning.

ME: What news have you been watching?? Obama does not invite the common folk to converse - he stands before a selected audience and campaigns. There is no discourse, no room for debate. They are not angry "mobs" - they are ordinary people who finally showed up to their town hall meetings to express their outrage at being ignored AGAIN (see stimulus package, omnibus bill, and suggested second stimulus bill). When the representatives began AGAIN to stand up and parrot the buzzwords and bylines, admitting themselves that they hadn't read this bill, the people stood up and said NO. I have to agree: if I say no nicely over and over and you still aren't hearing me, then I will say it louder and louder until you do. 
As far as WMD - Bush, like the Current Occupant of the White House, relies on his multitude of advisors, all of whom believed that Hussein had them. He certainly had the means to produce them and denied the UN access to check on that. And given the fact that this was after 9/11 (you remember that fun little day? 3,000+ people dead?), reasonable assumption is that he had something to hide. After all, let's face it: the man wasn't Walt Disney. He was a mass murderer and a tyrant. I am not a bit sorry he was removed from the planet by whichever way it was done.
The Patriot Act was enacted after the terrorist attacks to enable our people to track down this new type of enemy. They didn't and don't operate within the rules of war. They strap babies to women and use the women as shields while they shoot at our military. They murdered thousands of civilians - not our armed forces - because they are of the lowest of low of souls on the progression scale. I had to think hard and deep about what doors were being opened with that Act, and I came to the conclusion that it was a necessary evil, but I also felt that there should be limits. Listen to whatever, but NOTHING other than terrorist plots could be used - not going after some guy who's selling dope, or evading taxes, etc.
But no way in hell was I EVER going to listen to anything MoveOn said - that's an organization with too much money and too little sense, promoting the road to Communism.
But I'm not interesting in talking about the past. The past is the past, including EVERY president from Bush backwards. What I'd like to do is just what you and Manuel taught me, I want to examine the history, statements, and actions of the Current Occupant of the White House and get your take. Just say okay and I will ask my first question... 
[ED note: I am AGAIN asking to stick to the subject]

HER: People out of power ~~~ i.e., republican people stood up and said NO to Obama, that is all I see. News like public radio and CNN actually show the hysterical masses unlike entertainment news such as Fox hate news ‘all hate all the time’ stations with their big hair/boobied airbrushed “news” women chittering on propaganda while dumbed down listeners watch the flesh while being force fed gibberish the Foxes flash on the screen. Death panels??? C’mon, reallllly? Obama as Hitler??? (((laughing at that last one))))
As far as WMDs – Bush’s dopey mind was filled with them! Propaganda siezes the wild imaginations of any who are not able to reason for themselves. And the jury is STILL out on 911 to this day; after 9/11 I recall 3,000+ people dead - too many in fact to assume anything (as in who-dunnit). [ED note: ...and she's telling ME to use reason first!] Truth will come out o n this as well.
Reason, reason, reason! If the Patriot Act was enacted after the supposed terrorist attacks to enable our people to supposedly track down this new type of enemy, why tap Americans’ lines? 
[ED note: She doesn't realize that the terrorists were living in America and renting an apartment within view of the Pentagon] 
If we have the best of the best why not just send them in and get the job done like Rambo? Most likely the Patriot Act was concocted to assure the Bush admin that the common sheeple were buying the story they were perpetuating. Arrest the rest for any minor offense to keep ‘em from tapping the sleeple on their heads and awakening reason amongst the sleepy eyed masses…The Bush admin didn't operate within the rules of war. They tossed anyone into Abu Garaibe and turns out they will have to reopen and correct the atrocities (presueably done in my name!!!!). The Bush admin murdered thousands of civilians - - because they are of the lowest of low of souls on the progression scale (THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING). 
[ED note: Here's the point she makes that the Bush administration/military is worse than the terrorists]
Thanks to Move On I can now move on, as the real trouble has left the white house.
Good that you want to examine the history, statements, and actions of the Current Occupant of the White House to get your take. You MUST look a bit back to get the lessons in order to go foreward.
As for tit for tat, n ot gonna do that. 
[ED note: I have no idea what she's talking about here] 
This year I made a resolution; no amount of arguing will change the minds of those who have already calcified theirs. I light candles these days rather than curse darkness or strike about the mist. I get no thrill over bulging vein arguments that go nowhere. SO many lust after argumentation, many who carry (and equally lust to use them) guns. ~yehaw~
I am a firm believer that the pen is mightier and so I read and write.
Ask yourself all these questions. I have already given my view abundantly. 
[ED note: She is still refusing to accept my invitation to examine and discuss her logic for FAITH, TRUST, and love, love, LOVE of Obama]
Loads of books are coming out (some from inside the Bush admin) that you can read that will explain from the inside out what happened there. It isn’t fair to go on a rampage about this admin unless you understand what caused the majority to vote for the current one (include myself). That will answer every question no matter how loudly you ask me; it will help you understand why MOST voted for Obama and against Bushcrap. Become self informed. Be Well. Be happy and Be peaceful.

ME: Oh my GOD. I never realized the intensity of the hatred you carry for those with different viewpoints. I didn't say I wanted to do tit for tat. I said I wanted to understand what for you is now evidently a love aff air with Obama. I wanted to understand why you said you had so much LOVE and TRUST and FAITH. But the poison you just unleashed on me in that vitriolic diatribe tells me I am no longer interested in the opinion of someone I once admired. Thanks by the way for insulting me by calling me uninformed. I do my own research watching several news stations and alot of internet hunting. I access government sites and statistics and utilize outside watchdog groups that are not rabid in order to verify facts. How little you know of me...
And thanks for calling me a "yeehaw" because I own a gun for self-protection. I was almost raped in a B&E in Los Angeles, in case you didn't know. And just had a girl snatched from her home here in broad daylight, found raped and dumped in a ditch nearby. I don't want to stoop to your level with insults and name-calling, so this "force-fed, unreasonable, uninformed, illiterate, unwell, unhappy, tit-for-tatty, dumbed-down sheeple incapable of reasoning" should have no further contact with someone who is obviously so far above me both spiritually and intellectually that she finds great difficulty coming down to my level for discussion. Have a great life...
==========================
==================
And that was that. I'm perfectly fine with intelligent debate and just as fine if someone has a different viewpoint. I am NOT fine with someone who refuses to acknowledge fact and DEFINITELY not fine with someone who resorts to name calling and attacking my intelligence. Like the rattlesnake, first I warn then I strike. I'll say it again: DON'T TREAD ON ME...




Connect



Connect
Posted: August 31, 2009 - 1 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]
Category: Healthcare
@#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} #AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e p.MsoNormal,#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e li.MsoNormal,#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e h2 {mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-link:"Heading 2 Char"; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; font-size:18.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; font-weight:bold;}#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e h3 {mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-link:"Heading 3 Char"; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; font-size:13.5pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; font-weight:bold;}#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e a:link,#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;}#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e a:visited,#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;}#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e p {mso-style-priority:99; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e span.Heading2Char {mso-style-name:"Heading 2 Char"; mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-link:"Heading 2"; font-family:"Cambria","serif"; color:#4F81BD; font-weight:bold;}#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e span.Heading3Char {mso-style-name:"Heading 3 Char"; mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-link:"Heading 3"; font-family:"Cambria","serif"; color:#4F81BD; font-weight:bold;}#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e span.EmailStyle22 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;}#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; font-size:10.0pt;}@#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#AOLMsgPart_2_8af8a8b9-a71b-4b59-8ef4-51109fbc617e div.Section1 {page:Section1;}

 

 

Read all of the series by Jane M. Orient, MD, Executive Director of AAPS at

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------\

Myth 18: Proposed health care reform will not hasten the death of seniors, cancer patients, and disabled persons.

August 27th, 2009

The phrase “death panel” does not actually occur in any of the proposed “health care reform” bills. MoveOn.org has seized on Sarah Palin’s characterization of the outcome of “reform” in its mass email piece entitled “Top Five Health Care Reform Lies: and How to Fight Back”:

“Lie #1: President Obama wants to euthanize your grandma!!!”

When asked about the end-of-life counseling provision at an AARP-sponsored “tele-town hall,” Obama grinned and told the woman called “Mary”: “I guarantee you, first of all we just don’t have enough government workers to talk to everybody to find out how they want to die” (Judi McLeod, Canada Free Press 8/13/09).

This argument is a straw man.

In fact, neither the President nor cadres of government workers would be doing the job personally, and euthanasia is not being discussed. Rather, the bills “incentivize” doctors to “counsel” patients about “options”—which must include orders to withhold life-sustaining “treatment,” such as food and water.

While signing a directive to withhold treatment or food and water, or to implement a “do not resuscitate” order, may be voluntary, suggestible patients may bow to white-coated authority, especially when the directive is presented to them to sign immediately. Vulnerable patients may be especially susceptible to guilt-provoking scenarios, such as being a burden on their families.

The counseling provision has been removed from one of the Senate bills, but many believe the enabling legislation for treatment denial is already law, in the Stimulus Package, as comparative effectiveness research. While proponents denied that there was any intention to turn this into cost-effectiveness research, an amendment to codify that reassurance into law was defeated. This “research” program is supposed to collect information on every medical visit by every patient for a national electronic database.

This is the infrastructure for a program like Britain’s NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence), which determines the dollar value of a Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). NICE allows payment for treatments that cost less than that, and disallows treatments that cost more.

Doctors who want to violate the “voluntary guidelines” will likely have to appeal—to a body that is not called a “death panel” (Greg Scandlen, American Spectator 8/13/09).

What are the beliefs and principles of the leading reformers? Obama himself has said, “Maybe you’re better off not having the surgery but taking the painkiller.”

As Betsy McCaughey points out, prominent Administration advisor Ezekiel Emanuel, M.D., “believes that ‘communitarianism’ should guide care. He says that medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those ‘who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens…. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia’ (Hastings Center Report, November/December 1996)” (NY Post 7/24/09).

More recently, Emanuel and others write that they “recommend an alternate system, the ‘complete lives system,’ which prioritises younger people who have not yet lived a complete life, and also incorporates prognosis, saves the most lives, lottery, and instrumental value principles” (Lancet 2009;273:423-431).

This system “produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated.”

Obama’s regulatory czar Cass Sunstein, who will play a major role in defining government’s role in controlling medical care, prefers the QALY formula (Joseph Ashby, American Thinker 8/15/09).

Seniors are worried. Having lost about 60,000 members, AARP is back-pedaling on its endorsement of the reform push (Wall St J 8/21/09).

It’s not just seniors who are worried. There are also the 10 million American cancer patients whose access to expensive treatments may be cut off, as it routinely is in Britain. In addition, progress in treatments may stall because of the likelihood that new technology can never repay the cost of development (Wall St J 7/31/09).

The highly touted Oregon health plan already denies payment for advanced chemotherapy, but offers to buy physician-assisted suicide instead.

Then there’s the “Death Book for Veterans,” entitled Your Life, Your Choices. The primary author is Robert Pearlman, who in 1996 advocated for physician-assisted suicide before the U.S. Supreme Court in Vacco v. Quill, and is known to support rationing of medical care. The 52-page book presents choices in a way that steers users to predetermined conclusions, like a political “push poll.” Withdrawn from the VA by the Bush White House, the book has been resuscitated by the Obama Administration. The only organization listed in the updated version as a resource on advance directives is Compassion and Choices (formerly the Hemlock Society). A July 2009 directive instructs VA primary physicians to raise advance planning issues, using this book, with all patients, not just the aged or debilitated (Jim Towey, Wall St J ).

An angry disabled Marine veteran shared his views at a recent town hall with Congressman Brian Baird.

Hospice Patients Alliance, led by Ron Panzer, is concerned that U.S. federal and state government are already trying to balance budgets by hastening deaths, without raising the issue of explicit euthanasia. In the UK, where euthanasia is illegal, continuous deep sedation (CDS) may account for as many as one in six deaths (BBC News 8/12/09).

Palin quotes NY State Senator Ruben Diaz, a Democrat, chairman of the Aging Committee: “Section 1233 of [H.R.] 3200 puts our senior citizens on a slippery slope and may diminish respect for the inherent dignity of each of their lives” (Hawaii Free Press 8/12/09).

To the consternation of the Obama Administration and congressional Democrats, many Americans have shown up at tea parties and town halls with symbols warning about where that slippery slope has led before.

Daniel Greenfield observes the similarity in thoughts expressed by Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel and Dr. Hermann Pfannmüller, who stood trial at Nuremberg for his Starvation Hospitals for those he deemed unfit:

“The idea is unbearable to me that the best, the flower of our youth must lose its life at the front in order that feebleminded and irresponsible asocial elements can have a secure existence in the asylum.”

Pfannmüller preferred the “simpler, more natural” method of starvation to poisons or injections, which might supply “inflammatory material” for the foreign press.

“[A]t the heart of the difference between socialized medicine and free market health care,” writes Greenfield, is that “in the free market no one gets to class an entire category of people as “Life Unworthy of Life” (Canada Free Press 7/28/09).

Greenfield notes that it takes time for the consequences of changing from an individual to a collective morality to become manifest. “Most systems don’t turn monstrous over the weekend. Even Nazi Germany took nearly a decade to follow through on to the logical conclusion….” (Canada Free Press 8/11/09).

General Dwight D. Eisenhower ordered extensive photographs of those consequences to be taken, predicting that in 60 years some would try to deny that the events ever happened.




Connect



Connect
Posted: August 30, 2009 - 0 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]
Category: Humor

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO2eh6f5Go0




Connect



Connect
Posted: August 27, 2009 - 0 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]
Category: Healthcare

This seems to be a very well-informed crowd here on Freedom Torch.  However, I am providing here excerpts of text from the original proposed healthcare bill in case you know anyone who needs to be confronted by facts.  I have not altered any of the wording - this was cut straight out of the bill itself...they even made a typo!  The only thing I did was bold certain words to make it easier to understand the sentence.  Feel free to pass this along and along and along...  (I don't understand why the typeface changes sizes here but I can also send it to anyone via regular email)

Knowledge is power - fight on!

 HR 3200 EXCERPTS


cover page - To provide affordable, quality health care for all Americans and reduce the growth in health care spending, and for other purposes. 


 

pg 16 - SEC. 102. PROTECTING THE CHOICE TO KEEP CURRENT COVERAGE. 

(1) LIMITATION ON NEW ENROLLMENT.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day of Y1

  1. LIMITATION ON CHANGES IN TERMS OR CONDITIONS.—Subject to paragraph (3) and except as required by law, the issuer does not change any of its terms or conditions, including benefits and cost-sharing, from those in effect as of the day before the first day of Y1. 


pg 17 - (b) GRACE PERIOD FOR CURRENT EMPLOYMENT- BASED HEALTH PLANS.— 

(1) GRACE PERIOD.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner shall establish a grace period whereby, for plan years beginning after the end of the 5-year period beginning with Y1, an employment-based health plan in operation as of the day before the first day of Y1 must meet the same requirements as apply to a qualified health benefits plan under section 101, including the essential benefit package requirement under section 121.  


pg 19

(c) LIMITATION ON INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Individual health insurance coverage that is not grandfathered health insurance coverage under subsection (a) may only be offered on or after the first day of Y1 as an Exchange-participating health benefits plan


 

 

pg 22 - SEC. 113. INSURANCE RATING RULES. 

 

 

(2) REPORTS.—Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commissioner shall submit to Congress and the applicable agencies a report on the study conducted under paragraph (1). Such report shall include any recommendations the Commissioner deems appropriate to ensure that the law does not provide incentives for small and mid-size employers to self-insure...

 

 

pg 30 - SEC. 123. HEALTH BENEFITS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. 

 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—There is established a private-public advisory committee which shall be a panel of medical and other experts to be known as the Health Benefits Advisory Committee to recommend covered benefits and essential, enhanced, and premium plans.

(5) LEVELS OF COST-SHARING FOR ENHANCED AND PREMIUM PLANS.— (A) ENHANCED PLAN.—The level of cost-sharing for enhanced plans shall be designed so that such plans have benefits that are actuarially equivalent to approximately 85 percent of the actuarial value of the benefits provided under the reference benefits package described in section 122(c)(3)(B).  (B) PREMIUM PLAN.—The level of cost-sharing for premium plans shall be designed so that such plans have benefits that are actuarially equivalent to approximately 95 percent of the actuarial value of the benefits provided under the reference benefits package described in section 122(c)(3)(B). 

 

 

pg 43 - SEC. 142. DUTIES AND AUTHORITY OF COMMISSIONER. 

  1. IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner shall undertake activities in accordance with this subtitle to promote accountability of QHBP offering entities in meeting Federal health insurance requirements, regardless of whether such accountability is with respect to qualified health benefits plans offered through the Health Insurance Exchange or outside of such Exchange

(2) COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION AND AUDITS.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The commissioner shall, in coordination with States, conduct audits of qualified health benefits plan compliance with Federal requirements. Such audits may include random compliance audits and targeted audits in response to complaints or other suspected non-compliance. 

(B) RECOUPMENT OF COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH EXAMINATION AND AUDITS.—The Commissioner is authorized to recoup from qualified health benefits plans reimbursement for the costs of such examinations and audit...

 

pg 50

SEC. 152. PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION IN HEALTH CARE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise explicitly permitted by this Act and by subsequent regulations consistent with this Act, all health care and related services (including insurance coverage and public health activities) covered by this Act shall be provided without regard to personal characteristics extraneous to the provision of high quality health care or related services. 

 

 

pg 58 - SEC. 1173A. STANDARDIZE ELECTRONIC ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSACTIONS. 

(D) enable the real-time (or near real-time) determination of an individual’s financial responsibility at the point of service and, to the extent possible, prior to service, including whether the individual is eligible for a specific service with a specific physician at a specific facility, which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identification card; 

 

 

pg 84 -SEC. 203. BENEFITS PACKAGE LEVELS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner shall specify the benefits to be made available under Exchange-participating health benefits plans during each plan year, consistent with subtitle C of title I and this section. 

 

 

pg 110 - SEC. 207. HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGE TRUST FUND. 

(1) DEDICATED PAYMENTS.—There is hereby appropriated to the Trust Fund amounts equivalent to the following: 

(A) TAXES ON INDIVIDUALS NOT OBTAINING ACCEPTABLE COVERAGE.—The amounts received in the Treasury under section 59B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to requirement of health insurance coverage for individuals).  (B) EMPLOYMENT TAXES ON EMPLOYERS NOT PROVIDING ACCEPTABLE COVERAGE. 

(C) EXCISE TAX ON FAILURES TO MEET CERTAIN HEALTH COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS.

 

 

pg 119 - SEC. 222. PREMIUMS AND FINANCING. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF PREMIUMS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish geographically-adjusted premium rates for the public health insurance option 

pg 120 - (2) START-UP FUNDING.— (A) IN GENERAL.—In order to provide for the establishment of the public health insurance option there is hereby appropriated to the Secretary, out of any funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $2,000,000,000. (B) AMORTIZATION OF START-UP FUNDING.—The Secretary shall provide for the repayment of the startup funding provided under subparagraph (A) to the Treasury in an amortized manner over the 10-year period beginning with Y1.

 

 

pg 121 -SEC. 223. PAYMENT RATES FOR ITEMS AND SERVICES.

  1. RATES ESTABLISHED BY SECRETARY 1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish payment rates for the public health insurance option for services and health care providers

pg 124 -(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed as limiting the Secretary’s authority to correct for payments that are excessive or deficient, taking into account the provisions of section 221(a) and the amounts paid for similar health care providers and services under other Exchange-participating health benefits plans. 

(f) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review of a payment rate or methodology established under this section or under section 224. 

 

 

pg 125 - SEC. 224. MODERNIZED PAYMENT INITIATIVES AND DELIVERY SYSTEM REFORM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—For plan years beginning with Y1, the Secretary may utilize innovative payment mechanisms and policies to determine payments for items and services under the public health insurance option. The payment mechanisms and policies under this section may include patient-centered medical home and other care management payments, accountable care organizations, value-based purchasing, bundling of services...  

 

pg 149 - SEC. 313. EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS IN LIEU OF COVERAGE. 

(a) IN GENERAK.—A contribution is made in accordance with this section with respect to an employee if such 

contribution is equal to an amount equal to 8 percent of the average wages paid by the employer during the period 

of enrollment (determined by taking into account all employees of the employer and in such manner as the Commissioner provides, including rules providing for the appropriate aggregation of related employers). 

 

 

pg 167 - SEC. 59B. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE. 

‘‘(a) TAX IMPOSED.—In the case of any individual who does not meet the requirements of subsection (d) at any time during the taxable year, there is hereby imposed a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of— ‘‘(1) the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year, over ‘‘(2) the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer.  pg 181 - (1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any employer who fails (during any period with respect to which the election under subsection (a) is in effect) to satisfy the health coverage participation requirements with respect to any employee to whom such election applies, there is hereby imposed on each such failure with respect to each such employee a tax of $100 for each day in the period beginning on the date such failure first occurs and ending on the date such failure is corrected.  pg 183 - (c) EMPLOYERS ELECTING TO NOT PROVIDE HEALTH BENEFITS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—In addition to other taxes, there is hereby imposed on every nonelecting employer an excise tax, with respect to having individuals in his employ, equal to 8 percent of the wages (as defined in section 3121(a)) paid by him with respect to employment (as defined in section 3121(b)). 

pg 171

(5) RELIGIOUS CONSCIENCE EXEMPTION.— 

 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to any individual (and any qualifying child residing with such individual) for any period if such individual has in effect an exemption which certifies that such individual is a member of a recognized religious sect or division thereof described in section 1402(g)(1) and an adherent of established tenets or teachings of such sect or division as described in such section.   (B) EXEMPTION.—An application for the exemption described in subparagraph (A) shall be filed with the Secretary at such time and in such form and manner as the Secretary may prescribe. Any such exemption granted by the Secretary shall be effective for such period as the Secretary determines appropriate. 

 

 

pg 198 - SEC. 441. SURCHARGE ON HIGH INCOME INDIVIDUALS. 

‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—In the case of a taxpayer other than a corporation, there is hereby imposed (in addition to any other tax imposed by this subtitle) a tax equal to— (1) 1 percent of so much of the modified adjusted gross income of the taxpayer as exceeds $350,000 but does not exceed $500,000, (2) 1.5 percent of so much of the modified adjusted gross income of the taxpayer as exceeds $500,000 but does not exceed $1,000,000, and (3) 5.4 percent of so much of the modified adjusted gross income of the taxpayer as exceeds $1,000,000. 

 

pg 272 - SEC. 1145. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CANCER HOSPITALS. 

(18) AUTHORIZATION OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CANCER HOSPITALS.— 

 

(A) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine if, under the system under this subsection, costs incurred by hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v) with respect to ambulatory payment classification groups exceed those costs incurred by other hospitals furnishing services under this subsection (as determined appropriate by the Secretary).   (B) AUTHORIZATION OF ADJUSTMENT.— Insofar as the Secretary determines under subparagraph (A) that costs incurred by hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v) exceed those costs incurred by other hospitals furnishing services under this subsection, the Secretary shall provide for an appropriate adjustment

 

 

pg 281 - SEC. 1151. REDUCING POTENTIALLY PREVENTABLE HOSPITAL READMISSIONS

(p) ADJUSTMENT TO HOSPITAL PAYMENTS FOR EXCESS READMISSIONS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—With respect to payment for discharges from an applicable hospital (as defined in paragraph (5)(C)) occurring during a fiscal year beginning on or after October 1, 2011, in order to account for excess readmissions in the hospital, the Secretary shall reduce the payments that would otherwise be made to such hospital (**see actual bill for complex computations**)

pg 285 - (A) APPLICABLE CONDITION.—The term ‘applicable condition’ means, subject to subparagraph (B), a condition or procedure selected by the Secretary among conditions and procedures

pg 288 - (6) LIMITATIONS ON REVIEW.—There shall be no administrative or judicial review 

 

pg 297 - (d) PHYSICIANS.— (1) STUDY.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall conduct a study to determine how the readmissions policy described in the previous subsections could be applied to physicians.   (C) applying a payment reduction for physicians who treat the patient during the initial admission that results in a readmission

 

 

pg 424 - SEC. 1233. ADVANCE CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION. 

‘‘(hhh)(1) Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), the term ‘advance care planning consultation’ means a consultation between the individual and a practitioner described in paragraph (2) regarding advance care planning, if, subject to paragraph (3), the individual involved has not had such a consultation within the last 5 years.  Such consultation shall include the following:  (E) An explanation by the practitioner of the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available, including palliative care and hospice, and benefits for such services and supports that are available under this title. 

(F)(i) Subject to clause (ii), an explanation of orders regarding life sustaining treatment or similar orders, which shall include— the reasons why the development of such an order is beneficial to the individual and the individual’s family and the reasons why such an order should be updated periodically as the health of the individual changes; 

 

 

pg 502 - SEC. 1181. (a) CENTER FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH ESTABLISHED

 

pg 713 - SEC. 1633. REQUIRED INCLUSION OF PAYMENT MODIFIER FOR CERTAIN EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES.  (p) PAYMENT MODIFIER FOR CERTAIN EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES.—The Secretary shall establish a payment modifier under the fee schedule under this section for evaluation and management services (as specified in section 1842(b)(16)(B)(ii)) that result in the ordering of additional services (such as lab tests), the prescription of drugs, the furnishing or ordering of durable medical equipment in order to enable better monitoring of claims for payment for such additional services under this title, or the ordering, furnishing, or prescribing of other items and services determined by the Secretary to pose a high risk of waste, fraud, and abuse. 

 

pg 717 - SEC. 1636. MAXIMUM PERIOD FOR SUBMISSION OF MEDICARE CLAIMS REDUCED TO NOT MORE THAN 12 MONTHS. 

 

 

pg - 757 - SEC. 1704. REDUCTION IN MEDICAID DSH.

 

pg 828 - (2) ALLOCATION FOR COMMISSION.—Not less than the following amounts in the CERTF for a fiscal year shall be available to carry out the activities of the Comparative Effectiveness Research Commission established under section 1181(b) of the Social Security Act for such fiscal year:  (A) For fiscal year 2010, $7,000,000.  (B) For fiscal year 2011, $9,000,000.  (C) For each fiscal year beginning with 2012, $10,000,000.   Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as preventing additional amounts in the CERTF from being made available to the Comparative Effectiveness Research Commission for such activities.

 

pg 829 -Subchapter B—Insured and Self-Insured Health Plans  / SEC. 4375. HEALTH INSURANCE

(a) IMPOSITION OF FEE.—There is hereby imposed on each specified health insurance policy for each policy year a fee equal to the fair share per capita amount determined under section 9511(c)(1) multiplied by the average number of lives covered under the policy.  (b) LIABILITY FOR FEE.—The fee imposed by sub-section (a) shall be paid by the issuer of the policy.  (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, the term ‘specified health insurance policy’ means any accident or health insurance policy issued with respect to individuals residing in the United States. 

pg 831 - SEC. 4376. SELF-INSURED HEALTH PLANS. 

(a) IMPOSITION OF FEE.—In the case of any applicable self-insured health plan for each plan year, there is hereby imposed a fee equal to the fair share per capita amount determined under section 9511(c)(1) multiplied by the average number of lives covered under the plan.  (b) LIABILITY FOR FEE.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The fee imposed by subsection (a) shall be paid by the plan sponsor.   (2) PLAN SPONSOR.—For purposes of paragraph (1) the term ‘plan sponsor’ means— (A) the employer in the case of a plan established or maintained by a single employer,  (B) the employee organization in the case of a plan established or maintained by an employee organization... 

 

 

pg 836 - SEC. 1901. REPEAL OF TRIGGER PROVISION. 

Subtitle A of title VIII of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–173) is repealed and the provisions of law amended by such subtitle are restored as if such subtitle had never been enacted. 

 

 

 

 

If you would like a copy of the original bill emailed to you in PDF format, please contact me at MsJaneQPublic@gmail.com

 

 




Connect



Connect
Posted: August 25, 2009 - 0 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]
Category: Connecting

 I will also be fighting our battle on Facebook and bringing those connections here...I just put the page up tonight so there is nothing there yet.  Feel free to send me any info/news/links here and I will put it over there for the Facebook folks that don't know about FreedomTorch yet:

Jane Q Public on Facebook's Sarasota, FL network - you'll recognize my picture.




Connect



Connect
Posted: August 23, 2009 - 4 comment(s) [ Comment ] - 0 trackback(s) [ Trackback ]
Category: First Amendment

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNoBLa7lhXY

It just seems very contradictory to the First Amendment which says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."  I can understand (although I still have a problem with petitioning the government for a permit) if a group has organized a huge number of people who plan to assemble in a park or on the National Mall, for example, but to walk the streets with signs?  Seems like it won't be too long before we have to apply for a permit to protest and be placed in the designated Protest Zone...a la China.




Connect