Recent Forum Topics

• Obama is in court, he is loosing

  By Jeff L

  In Obama & the Democrats

  Fri at 9:58 AM
  http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138
   
  OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW
  By Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am...  morehttp://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138
   
  OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW
  By Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am
  Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.
  The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.
  Promptly at 9am  EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.
  The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.
  With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the judge.
  Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.
  Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.
  After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.
   
  Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.
  Game on.
  5 minutes.
  10 minutes.
  15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.
  20 minutes.
  It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s chambers.
  Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?
  Certainly not.
  Court is called to order.
  Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.
  Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
  Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.
  Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.
  June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.
  Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.
  It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.
  The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.
  Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.
  Carl Swinson takes the stand.
  Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.
  2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.
  Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.
  Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.
  RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.
  DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
  Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.
  Dreams From My Father entered.
  Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
  Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
  This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
  At this point, the judge takes a recess.
  The judge returns.
  David Farrar takes the stand.
  Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.
  Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strunk.
  Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.
  State Licensed PI takes the stand.
  She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that the true owner of the number was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.
  Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
  Next witness takes the stand.
  This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.
  Linda Jordan takes the stand.
  Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.
  Next witness.
  Mr. Vogt.
  Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
  Mr. Vogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.
  States this is a product of layering.
  Mr. Vogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.
  Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.
  Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.
  Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
  Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
  Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.
  Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.
  Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
  Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
  Taitz takes the stand herself.
  Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.
  Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.
  Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.
  And with that, the judge closes the hearing.
  What can we take away from this?
  It’s interesting.
  Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.
  One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.
  WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY?
  Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in question.
  One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President.
  What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.
  It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.
  Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.  less
• WW3 - War over the oil routes?

  By Ma Ko

  In BREAKING NEWS

  Fri at 5:56 AM
  Military tensions in the Persian Gulf shot up again Thursday, Jan. 26, after Dubai police commander Gen. Dhahi Khalfan said on Al Arabiya television that an imminent Gulf war cannot be ruled out and first signs are already apparent. "The world will not let Iran block Hormuz but Tehran can narrow the strait to the maximum," he said.
  He echoed debkafile's predictions that Iran will not shut down the Strait of Hormuz completely, but gradually cut down tanker traffic which carries 17 million barrels, or one-fifth of the world's daily consumption, through the waterway. Our Iranian sources report that the rule of thumb Tehran has devised for confront sanctions is to respond to the tightening of an oil embargo by having the Revolutionary Guards gradually narrow the tankers' shipping lanes through the strategic strait. This will progressively cut down the amount of oil reaching the markets.
  Tehran will not go all the way and shut the channel down completely for fear of provoking a military showdown with the United States. But each time Washington manages to stop Iran supplying a given country, the IRGC will shut down another section of the strait.
  General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff admitted on Jan. 8 that Iran has the capacity to block the Strait of Hormuz temporarily but the US would get it reopened within a short time....  moreMilitary tensions in the Persian Gulf shot up again Thursday, Jan. 26, after Dubai police commander Gen. Dhahi Khalfan said on Al Arabiya television that an imminent Gulf war cannot be ruled out and first signs are already apparent. "The world will not let Iran block Hormuz but Tehran can narrow the strait to the maximum," he said.
  He echoed debkafile's predictions that Iran will not shut down the Strait of Hormuz completely, but gradually cut down tanker traffic which carries 17 million barrels, or one-fifth of the world's daily consumption, through the waterway. Our Iranian sources report that the rule of thumb Tehran has devised for confront sanctions is to respond to the tightening of an oil embargo by having the Revolutionary Guards gradually narrow the tankers' shipping lanes through the strategic strait. This will progressively cut down the amount of oil reaching the markets.
  Tehran will not go all the way and shut the channel down completely for fear of provoking a military showdown with the United States. But each time Washington manages to stop Iran supplying a given country, the IRGC will shut down another section of the strait.
  General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff admitted on Jan. 8 that Iran has the capacity to block the Strait of Hormuz temporarily but the US would get it reopened within a short time.
  Saudi Arabia and Dubai are skeptical about the ability of the American navy and Gulf forces to keep the Strait of Hormuz open at all times in the face of continuous Iranian attacks.
  The prevailing view in Gulf capitals is that for the six months from February through July 1, when the European embargo on Iranian oil and the Iranian national bank freeze kick in, a war of attrition will unfold as Iran carries out sporadic strait closures, either by mining the waterway or firing missiles at tankers from unmarked speedboats.
  These operations will push up the price of oil and so drum home to oil-dependent Asian and European governments the high cost to them of the alternate opening and closing of the Strait of Hormuz.
  A Saudi official said Wednesday, Jan. 1, that Tehran's threats to punish Riyadh for offering to make up the shortfall incurred from the oil embargo against Iran "could be seen by Saudi Arabia as an act of war."
  The Iranian threats followed the pledge made this week by Saudi Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi to raise daily production by up to 2.7 million barrels per day to supply the countries caught short of supplies from Iran.
  However, the Saudi minister could not say how the oil would make its way out of the Persian Gulf to destination if the Strait of Hormuz were to be shuttered partially or fully.
  debkafile's military and Gulf sources report that Persian Gulf capitals are talking less these days about an outbreak of armed hostilities over Iran's nuclear program and more about the coming war over the oil shipping routes out to market.
  The Dubai general's remarks Thursday about an imminent conflict referred not only to the flow of American reinforcements to the Gulf region but also to the new deployments of the armies of Gulf Cooperation Council states. They are moving into position in expectation of a military confrontation with Iran.  less
• Two New States Massachusetts And Obama’s Very Own Illinois Challenge Barrack’s Official Ballot Eligibility.

  By Rita Monceaux

  In BREAKING NEWS

  Fri at 4:58 AM
  BREAKING => Two New States Massachusetts And Obama’s Ve...  moreBREAKING => Two New States Massachusetts And Obama’s Very Own Illinois Challenge Barrack’s Official Ballot Eligibility.
  January 21, 2012 by Volubrjotr  
• ILLEGAL ALIENS/ WHAT IF???

  By Rita Monceaux

  In Miscellaneous

  Fri at 3:52 AM
  This is really food for thought.  
   
            What if the illegals left....
   ...  moreThis is really food for thought.  
   
            What if the illegals left....
   
            Somebody really did their homework on this one.
            
            What if 20 Million Vacated America ?
   
            I, Tina Griego, journalist for the Denver Rocky Mountain News wrote a column titled, "Mexican Visitor's Lament".
            I interviewed Mexican journalist Evangelina Hernandez while visiting Denver last week. Hernandez said, "illegal aliens pay rent, buy groceries, buy clothes. What Happens to your country's economy if 20 million people go away?" Hmmm, I thought, what would happen?
   
            So I did my due diligence, buried my nose as a reporter into the
  FACTS I found below.
   
            It's a good question it deserves an honest answer. Over 80% of Americans demand secured borders and illegal migration stopped. But what would happen if all 20 million or more vacated America . The answers I found may surprise you!
   
            In California , if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico , it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on overloaded school systems, bankrupt hospitals and overrun prisons. It would leave highways cleaner, safer and less congested. Everyone could understand one another as English became the dominant language again.
   
            In Colorado, 500,000 illegal migrants, plus their 300,000 kids and grandchildren would move back 'home', mostly to Mexico  That would save Colorado an estimated $2 billion (other experts say $7 billion) annually in taxes that pay for schooling, medical, social-services and incarceration costs. It means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denver alone.
   
             Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local citizens. Denver Officer Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims would not have suffered death, accidents, rapes and other crimes by illegals.
   
            Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67% dropout/flunk rate because of thousands of illegal alien students speaking 41 different languages. At least 200,000 vehicles would vanish from our grid locked cities in Colorado . Denver ’s 4% unemployment rate would vanish as our
  working poor would gain jobs at a living wage.
   
            In Florida , 1.5 million illegals would return the Sunshine State back to America , the rule of law, and English.
   
            In Chicago , Illinois , 2.1 million illegals would free up hospitals, schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and more crime-free experience.
   
            If 20 million illegal aliens returned 'home', the U.S. Economy would return to the rule of law Employers would hire legal American citizens at a living wage. Everyone would pay their fair share of taxes because they wouldn't be working off the books. That would result in an additional $401 Billion in IRS income taxes collected annually, and an equal amount for local, state and city coffers.
   
            No more push '1' for Spanish or '2' for English. No more confusion in American schools that now must contend with over 100 languages that degrade the educational system for American kids. Our overcrowded schools would lose more than two million illegal alien kids at a cost of billions in ESL and free breakfasts and lunches.
   
            We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of more than $1.6 billion annually. That includes 15,000 MS-13 gang members who distribute $130 billion in drugs annually would vacate our country.
   
            In cities like L.A. , 20,000 members of the ' 18th Street Gang' would vanish from our nation. No more Mexican forgery gangs for ID theft from Americans! No more foreign rapists and child molesters!  
            Losing more than 20 million people would clear up our crowded highways and gridlock. Cleaner air and less drinking and driving American deaths by illegal aliens!
   
             America 's economy is drained. Taxpayers are harmed. Employers get rich. Over $80 billion annually wouldn't return to the aliens' home countries by cash transfers. Illegal migrants earned half that money untaxed, which further drains America 's economy which currently suffers an $8.7 trillion debt. $8.7 trillion debt!!
   
            At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country, costing us $109 billion per year per cycle. At least 86 hospitals in California , Georgia and Florida would still be operating instead of being bankrupt out of existence because illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act.
   
            Americans wouldn't suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis cases rampant in our country-brought in by illegals unscreened at our borders.
   
            Our cities would see 20 million less people driving, polluting and grid locking our cities. It would also put the 'progressives' on the horns of a dilemma; illegal aliens and their families cause 11% of our greenhouse gases.
   
            Over one million of Mexico's poorest citizens now live inside and along our border from Brownsville, Texas to San Diego, California in what the New York Times called, 'colonias' or new neighborhoods. Trouble is, those living areas resemble Bombay and Calcutta where grinding poverty, filth, diseases, drugs, crimes, no sanitation and worse. They live without sewage, clean water, streets, roads, electricity, or any kind of sanitation.
   
            The New York Times reported them to be America 's new ' Third World ' inside our own country. Within 20 years, at their current growth rate, they expect 20 million residents of those colonias. (I've seen them personally in Texas and Arizona ; it's sickening beyond anything you can imagine.)
   
            By enforcing our laws, we could repatriate them back to Mexico . We should invite 20 million aliens to go home, fix their own countries and/or make a better life in Mexico . We already invite a million people into our country legally more than all other countries combined annually. We cannot and must not allow anarchy at our borders, more anarchy within our borders and growing lawlessness at every level in our nation.
   
            It's time to stand up for our country, our culture, our civilization and our way of life.
            Interesting Statistics!
   
            Here are 14 reasons illegal aliens should vacate America, and I hope they are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them:
   
            1. $14 billion to $22 billion dollars are spent each year on welfare to illegal aliens. (that's Billion with a 'B')
  http://tinyurl.com/zob77.html
   
            3. $7.5 billion dollars are spent each year on Medicaid for illegal aliens. http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html
   
            4. $12 billion dollars are spent each year on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they still cannot speak a word of English!
  http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
   
            5. $27 billion dollars are spent each year for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.
  http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
   
            6. $3 Million Dollars 'PER DAY' is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. That's $1.2 Billion a year.
  http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
   
            7. 28% percent of all federal prison inmates are illegal aliens.
  http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
   
            8. $190 billion dollars are spent each year on illegal aliens for welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.
  http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0610/29/ldt.01.html
   
            9. $200 billion dollars per year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.
  http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html
   
            10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US .
  http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0606/12/ldt.01.html
   
            11. During the year 2005, there were 8 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our southern border with as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from other terrorist countries. Over 10,000 of those were middle-eastern terrorists. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin, crack, Guns, and marijuana crossed into the U.S. from the southern border.
  http://tinyurl.com/t9sht
   
            12. The National Policy Institute, estimates that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion, or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period and nbsp; http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/publications.php?b=deportation
   
            13. In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $65 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin, to their families and friends.
  http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm
   
            14. The dark side of illegal immigration: Nearly one million sex crimes are committed by illegal immigrants in the United States !
  http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml
   
            Total cost a whopping:
   
            $538.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR!  less
• Change is...Stupid

  By Todd "tryanmax" Maxwell

  In BREAKING NEWS

  Thu at 10:59 AM
  Obama's disastrous new campaign slogan
  The Obama-Biden campaign has chosen "Change Is"for its 2012 slogan. (I'd say they put an exclamation point on it, but it's an open-ended sentence.)  This is just begging to back-fire. It invites everyone to finish the thought however they choose. Allow me to demonstrate:
  Change Is...Death Panels becoming a reality if Obamacare stands.
  Change Is...spending all your change and your kid's too. ...  moreObama's disastrous new campaign slogan
  The Obama-Biden campaign has chosen "Change Is"for its 2012 slogan. (I'd say they put an exclamation point on it, but it's an open-ended sentence.)  This is just begging to back-fire. It invites everyone to finish the thought however they choose. Allow me to demonstrate:
  Change Is...Death Panels becoming a reality if Obamacare stands.
  Change Is...spending all your change and your kid's too.
  Change Is...acquiescing to terrorist's demands for a place at the table.
  Change Is...mocking, degrading, dismissing, chastising, recklessly minimizing Americans and their belief system.
  Change Is...a transparent administration (oh, wait...)
  Change Is...considering self-appointed czars a needed part of government.
  Change Is...snuggling up to our enemies while alienating our friends.
  Change Is...worthless solar panels instead of reliable fuel.
  Change Is...remapping the Middle East and making it more threatening than before.
  Change Is...bowing to foreign princes and apologizing for America's greatness.
  Change Is...taking an economy on the brink and shoving it over the edge.
  Change Is...food stamps for all!
  Let's keep it going, people! I want this coming back to my inbox in a month.  less